‘Hire slow, fire fast’ - it’s an old business adage that continues to hold traction today. But in today’s hiring environment, what is most important when it comes to bringing new people on board? Getting them in quickly or ensuring they are perfect for the position through extensive interviewing and testing?
The value your organisation places on hiring times depends largely on the role you are recruiting for and the level of talent available. If you are confident that your company will not struggle to fill the vacancy, you can afford to spend time on your employee hunt, looking for the right person. However, if you’re competing against rival firms for the best candidates, you’ll need to ensure that you’re acting quickly and decisively.
The value in longer recruitment processes
There are certainly advantages to longer interview periods. According to former Apple executive Guy Kawasaki, hiring too fast can lead to a “bozo explosion,” meaning that when companies bring new employees on board very quickly during periods of rapid growth, they can make mistakes. He added: "Unfortunately, many companies adopt the attitude of ‘hire any intelligent body, or we'll lose business - we'll sort everything out later’.”
There are benefits and risks to hiring quickly, so it is important to establish what the priority is for your organisation when recruiting.
Losing business in the short term might be a risk of not hiring people quickly, but companies also need to be aware of the risk of not hiring the right people. A recent report by the Recruitment & Employment Confederation (REC) found that a poor hire at mid-manager level with an annual salary of £42,000 can cost a business more than £132,000.
According to the report, the hidden costs involved in recruiting the wrong people include money wasted on training, lost productivity, and increased staff turnover. REC chief executive Kevin Green said that his organisation’s “calculations show that UK businesses are wasting billions every year because of the volume of hiring mistakes being made”. The financial impact of not making the right decision is the biggest reason to take your time over hiring.
The risks of not hiring quickly
However, are you risking top talent being poached? Companies with intensive bureaucratic procedures attached to their hiring processes could find that while they are inputting all the necessary paperwork, candidates are tempted elsewhere.
Recruiting is inherently a human pursuit, which means you’re dealing with people’s emotions. There is always the chance that people might change their minds. If a hiring process takes too long, it’s possible that candidates will lose interest in your company and move on. If your organisation has particularly extensive interview processes, you could be vulnerable to these human factors.
It’s something to consider when evaluating the length of your interview processes.
UK hiring times rising
Businesses around the world are finding that it’s taking them longer to hire someone. The UK’s average interview process period is one of the longest, at 28.6 days, according to Glassdoor Economic Research.
With artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics taking over many lower skilled jobs, including those of cashiers and factory workers, it is perhaps unsurprising that hiring periods are becoming elongated. This is due to the fact high-skilled jobs requiring creativity and technical skills typically necessitate longer, more intense screening processes.
Hiring managers at larger companies bringing top-level professionals on board might find that they struggle to shorten their recruiting times. When this is the case, it’s important for them to ensure that they are doing all they can to keep candidates engaged during the hiring process.
A strong employer brand can also help to keep top talent interested in working for your company. Candidates who know what the benefits of being an employee at your organisation will be more likely to want to last through the process and eventually start working there.
Posted by Jon Aspinell on 18th September 2017
PHP / Web Developer
£45000 - £55000 per annum
Web Developer / Software Development Business / up to £55,000 / Central London A relatively small but highly successf...
SQL Developer - London- £50,000
City of London, London
£45000 - £50000 per annum + bonus + benefits
SQL Developer - London - £50,000 plus bonus and benefits An international tech law firm, enjoying a market leading po...
A fast growing young, vibrant tech business with offices in Coventry and part of a wider technology group, are seekin...
Senior Project Manager
A successful software house specialising in online platforms and back office systems is expanding rapidly. Recently a...
Trainee AWS Cloud Engineer
This is an exceptional opportunity for an experienced Linux or Windows systems engineer looking to move into a cloud ...
City of London
Web Developer (Angular and Node) - Earl's Court - £380 p/d A well established and hugely successful online business w...
How can you ensure cohesive communication with a team of remote workers?
Remote working is becoming increasingly adopted by organisations across the globe - whether that takes the form of an...
Can HR tech ease workplace conflict?
Workplace conflict is mostly unavoidable - particularly when businesses hire strong-minded talent with big ideas. Ego...
What to prioritise in your employee experience
The candidate experience has long been valued by employers looking to attract fresh talent. Now, however, companies a...
What can HR expect in 2018?
HR departments are set to face many new challenges in 2018, from the technological to the traditional. Among the most...
From communication to drive: The importance of soft skills
Soft skills are often difficult to quantify, yet they can become an absolute necessity for your business to reach its...
Only one in three workers say their employers offer training
Just one-third of workers report that their employer offers regular training opportunities, a new poll by the Trades ...